Our Blog
The OpenSymmetry blog provides readers with information about our services, the advice from our thought leaders and SPM technology experts, and much more. Feel free to filter by category and let us know if you have any questions.
BaoViet Successfully Deploys SAP SuccessFactors Incentive Management Solution
BaoViet Successfully Deploys SAP SuccessFactors Incentive Management Solution In July 2022, OpenSymmetry, a global consulting firm that specializes in the planning, implementation, and optimization of top-tier Sales Performance Management systems, announced a...
The Right Sales Plan Incentives and Alignment Deliver Sales Success
The Right Sales Plan Incentives and Alignment Deliver Sales Success Assume you all watched the game on Sunday and what a game it was! It got me thinking about our sales incentive industry and how having the right plans, incentives, and alignment to goals can...
Enhancing End User Experience
Enhancing End User Experience Even the best implementations of an Incentive Compensation Management (ICM) system can be considered unsuccessful if you have poor end user adoption of the system after you go live. Below are key best practice recommendations when...
Status Quo Must Go | The Revenue Centric Business Case
Status Quo Must GoThe Revenue Centric Business Case Tom Davis Carriers regularly cite lack of budget as a reason for being unable to improve or replace their distribution management and incentive compensation platforms, but there is an argument to be made that...
Cost of Maintaining Legacy Platforms
The Challenges of Legacy Platforms for Distribution Management and Incentive Compensation in Insurance Tom Davis Older legacy platforms pose various challenges for carriers and create barriers to adapting to competitive pressures, supporting strategic...
Post Go-Live Services Blueprint
Post Go-Live SPM Services Blueprint OVERVIEW Are you planning to implement an SPM application within your organization? If you are, have you considered all the necessary services you need to enable to properly and efficiently support that implementation once you...
How Many Comp Plans Does an Organization Need?
How Many Comp Plans Does an Organization Need? Does your organization have too many compensation plans? Or not enough? Many are quick to assume that the fewer compensation plans an organization has, the better. An organization can quickly become bogged down with...
Business Case Simplified: Producer Lifecycle Management (PLCM)
Business Case Simplified: Producer Lifecycle Management (PLCM) Investment in a top-tier Producer Lifecycle Management (PLCM) solution is not an insignificant expense and securing a budget can be a difficult undertaking. Vendors will often provide support in the...
Automating Eligibility Within an ICM Application
Automating Eligibility Within an ICM Application OVERVIEW As a Compensation Administrator, you see changes all the time related to whether or not payees are eligible for incentive compensation throughout your organization’s compensation cycle. Since you know that...
About Us
OpenSymmetry enables clients to achieve greater operational efficiency and get better sales results. We are a global consulting company specializing in the planning, implementation, and optimization of industry leading technology suppliers of sales performance management solutions.
CONSIDERATIONS WHEN REPLACING YOUR SPM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION
Understanding the challenges companies face when migrating Sales Performance Management (SPM) technology solutions can be a significant undertaking. This paper is designed to provide high-level guidance to stakeholders who carry this responsibility. As OpenSymmetry has helped many companies evaluate and effectively migrate to new technology solutions, we are sharing seven key areas that we find critical to completing this kind of effort.
1. CURRENT STATE ASSESSMENT & FUTURE STATE PLANNING
A critical initial step before migrating to a new SPM solution is understanding how well your current program is performing across people, processes, and technology. From there you can devise a future state vision for how your SPM program should operate. By understanding both current state gaps and what your future state needs look like, you can effectively begin defining requirements while also clearly articulating success criteria. It’s important to recognize that your previous or initial SPM implementation may not have gathered all necessary processes/requirements, so it’s vital to take a fresh, holistic view in this first step.
2. DATA INTEGRATION
One of the most complex and time-consuming requirements is determining how to best leverage current source data feeds to support the new platform. Within the context of your current state assessment and future state planning, the team should review what their reporting, analytics, and any future state compensation elements needs are to ensure a meaningful inventory of data requirements are defined. SPM solutions vary in terms of how data is gathered, translated, and uploaded into the system. Some solution applications may have a standardized format requiring additional configuration, whereas others may have the ability of data field mapping, which provides additional flexibility. The ability to own the data translation from your source systems to the SPM platform is key. Another focus point is to ensure that you evaluate all manual feeds to incorporate automation, as well as any additional error validation processes.
3. HISTORICAL DATA
Migrating historical data is an often-overlooked requirement when moving from one SPM platform to another. To keep costs down and minimize complexity, clients may want to ID only the data that is needed to ensure ongoing management of comp (e.g. payment history) and then transfer detail-level data into data storage to be referenced at a future date. It is important to consider what historical data is needed for the new system for reference on future payments
4. PROCESS IMPROVEMENT
Each SPM solution may require users to interact with the system in different ways. This area may need additional attention, especially as it has the potential to improve processes currently employed to manage sales compensation. Understanding the impact a new system will have on current processes, as well as those who manage the processes, is critical to ensuring a successful launch and ongoing management of core processes. As an example, two of the leading solutions in the market have very different expectations regarding the skills users need to possess to effectively maintain compensation plans and reports and, in some cases, execute the day-to-day activities. Defining expectations of your staff related to the new technology, prior to the project, will ideally give your organization the necessary time to introduce training that ensures effective ongoing management of the program.
5. WORKFLOW
SPM solutions vary widely in their ability to support automated workflow. As a result, there are significant challenges for sales compensation teams related to an SPM migration. Capabilities can range from templates to existing documentation, levels of routing, and even implementation of a stopgap for a payee to accept plan documentation prior to payout. Within the context of your future state definition, capturing and defining areas where automated workflows can be leveraged is a necessary part of the core requirements. Before a new system is deployed, it is important to map these processes out to drive user adoption, leverage the SPM system as an auditable repository, and minimize email management.
6. REPORTING & ANALYTICS
It is critical to develop a holistic vision of information distribution to the various stakeholders and tools used to deliver this content (i.e. static pages vs. dashboards). Similar to workflows, different vendors have various capabilities related to reporting for the end users. Assessing these capabilities against your business requirements is imperative to the success of the roll-out. For example, some vendors require more robust configurations in the system (e.g. crediting logic) to enable specific analytics capabilities, while some solutions, architected specifically for reporting and analytics, have much more robust capabilities. Another area for consideration is the use of the vendor’s reporting solution against your in-house technology stack. Some solutions make it easy to port data into new environments, which could be a consideration in helping to keep the number of reporting tools requiring management to a minimum.
7. DEPLOYMENT
The implementation of a new solution should be designed to minimize the impact on payees and managers. One of the most critical aspects of your effort is assessing how all stakeholders will be impacted and how to mitigate any disruption. It is important to identify upcoming changes for your sales organization, administrators, and other internal partners with a plan in place to offer the steps needed to ensure the best chances for solution adoption.
The first step when considering a new SPM platform is an assessment of your current program and the development of a future state vision. OpenSymmetry offers a no-cost workshop to help you gain an understanding of how your current SPM program performs against your needs and industry best practices, as well as a readout on current solutions in the market.
Leveraging the OpenSymmetry assessment methodology and knowledge of the leading SPM providers, you will be equipped with:
• A current state analysis scorecard
• The framework for a business case to support change
• Contemporary intel on the SPM market and SPM vendor capabilities
• High-level deployment and license cost estimates